Sudbury Working Group

Local Independent News

More independent news:
Do you want free independent news delivered weekly? sign up now
Can you support independent journalists with $5? donate today!

Is it bad planning to allow more and smaller rural lots outside the City’s Living Area?

Blog posts reflect the views of their authors.

Wouldn’t it be nice if we could have whatever we wanted whenever we wanted it? But by living in a community, we sometimes have to accept what is best for everyone and not just our own interests. For instance, I might want to put my septic field bed on one part of my land but to protect my neighbour’s well water, I may be told to put it further away. Or I might want to open up a car repair shop in my garage but since it’s in a residential area, I wouldn’t be allowed to. Good urban planning looks at appropriate land uses, past mistakes in land use and ensures that problems and high costs in the future are averted for the good of all residents in a city. Wherever we live, there are rules that balance our rights with the rights of our neighbours, and individual gain with overall gain.  It’s not communism. It’s good planning.

And that brings us to a decision City Council will be voting on next Tuesday. Specifically, they will vote on whether to recommend change to the Official Plan, our planning guide, to allow land owners the option to sever their rural land into more and smaller lots than is currently allowed. The City has more than enough lots available for future growth in the Living Area as well as plenty of rural lots so neither future growth nor freedom of choice to live out of town are reasons for this possible change.  Some rural landowners understandably want to make a profit from their land.  But what does good planning say about this type of extra rural growth? Is it sustainable for a city like ours which is already spread across such a large area?

The argument is often made that rural lots bring in taxes, but cost the city little to nothing in services.   But that’s simply not the case.  Studies have shown that new taxes collected from these rural lots do not pay for the extra costs to provide service. And while cities have a duty to provide a certain level of service to their residents, it may not be able to unless it passes the extra costs on to all of its citizens. Are you willing to give up some of your service or pay more in taxes to add to the surplus of rural lots? I doubt many Sudburians would agree to this in light of current deficits already seen in infrastructure funding.  All levels of government are having trouble keeping up with infrastructure costs and we should not knowingly create this added burden. It’s difficult to have to tell someone they can’t make thousands more dollars from the sale of their land but it’s even more difficult to cut back on basic services.  

Council has a duty to all of us to make sustainable decisions. That far outweighs the individual gain of a few landowners.  Add in considerations about food security and supporting local farmers and the proposal makes even less sense.  Lost in the news clips are the (quieter) voices of farmers and other rural residents opposed to fragmenting rural land.  Time to put the politics aside and have a compassionate, unifying and forward looking community conversation on this issue.

 

Lilly Noble

Co-Chair, Coalition for a Liveable Sudbury
 


Socialize:
Want more grassroots coverage?
Join the Media Co-op today.

About the poster

Trusted by 0 other users.
Has posted 1 times.
View Lilly Noble's profile »

Recent Posts:


Lilly Noble (Lilly Noble)
Sudbury, ON
Member since Juillet 2013

About:

Co-Chair, Coalition for a Liveable Sudbury

551 words
Join the media co-op today
Things the Media Co-op does: Support
Things the Media Co-op does: Report
Things the Media Co-op does: Network
Things the Media Co-op does: Educate
Things the Media Co-op does: Discover
Things the Media Co-op does: Cooperate
Things the Media Co-op does: Build
Things the Media Co-op does: Amplify

About the Sudbury Working Group

The Sudbury working-group of The Media Co-op was formed to create independent media in the North, to speak to our issues and outlooks on our communities as well as the world around us. Independent media provides an avenue for people who are wishing to gain critical perspective on the issues that matter most to us, and to give a voice to those people and stories that you won't find in the mainstream media.

Currently, the Sudbury working group is on pause, due to a lack of members.  If you are keen to take on the challenge of creating and supporting local grassroots media, please get in touch.

Contact us at grassrootssudburymedia@gmail.com or follow us on Facebook.

If we become active again, we encourage you to support local grassroots media by:

  • Getting a membership. Membership fees are intended to pay local writers for local content and support emerging writers.  Membership forms are here
  • Submitting content. We are able to pay for a limited number of strong local pieces.  Contact us to pitch an idea, or for story ideas.   See our Editorial Policy here.  We encourage local grassroots groups to submit content about their work, issues and events.  

 

 

 

 

 

Connexion utilisateur


Google+
Subscribe to the Dominion $25/year

The Media Co-op's flagship publication features in-depth reporting, original art, and the best grassroots news from across Canada and beyond. Sign up now!